The ALPR Machine: The Companies Behind North Carolina’s Plate-Reader Surveillance

Here is the uncomfortable part. This network is not something being done to us by strangers. It is something we help pay to build — a dollar at a time, with the taxes we pay and the money we spend at the register. Government writes the checks, but private companies design the cameras, host them, certify the poles, and store the data — and every one of them is funded, somewhere upstream, by us.

Follow a single license-plate camera outward, from the parcel it stands on to the database it feeds, and a business is standing at every step, holding out a hand. We name only the links the record supports, and we say clearly where the record runs out. Then we come back to the part that matters most: the same choices that built this — who we elect, where we spend, whether we show up — are the ones that can unbuild it. (The public officials who authorized it are covered separately, in Where They Stand.)

Local: the land it stands on

Flock does not usually own the ground its cameras sit on. On private property, the company mounts its readers under Property License Agreements with landowners — an arrangement Pender’s own Sheriff described in his public statement, acknowledging cameras “on both public and private property through Property License Agreements facilitated by Flock.”

Public property records, cross-referenced with camera locations reported on the crowdsourced DeFlock map, indicate that plate readers across the Cape Fear region sit on land owned by private companies and associations — not just government. Two honest caveats up front: the map’s coordinates are crowdsourced and unverified, so a pin may be misplaced; and owning the parcel nearest a camera is not proof the owner installed one or agreed to anything. With that said, property records indicate the following entities own land where cameras are reported:

• D & J Properties, Inc. — NC Hwy 210, Hampstead (Pender County)
• Cross Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. — Candlewood Dr, Rocky Point (Pender County)
• ACPR Leasehold, LLC — Porters Neck Rd, Wilmington (New Hanover County)
• Lumina Commons Stations, LLC — Eastwood Rd, Wilmington (New Hanover County)
• Leland Town Center, LLC — Leland (Brunswick County)
• Rooks Farm Service, Inc. — NC Hwy 210, Rocky Point (Pender County)

And the hosts aren’t only local landowners — national retailers do it too. Lowe’s Home Improvement gave the SBI standing, warrantless access to its Flock cameras across three states — and never told its customers. It is the cleanest version of the “where we spend our money” problem: the same store you shop at can be a node in the police surveillance network, its parking-lot cameras feeding a system you never agreed to.

The HOA on that list is worth pausing on: North Carolina’s entire fight over whether Flock is even licensed began because a homeowners’ association installed the cameras and a resident complained to the state (more below). Private hosts — businesses, shopping centers, and neighborhood associations — are how a “police” camera network quietly grows on land the public never voted to surveil.

Statewide: the vendor, and the license that lets it operate

Flock Safety, Inc. (Atlanta) is the vendor at the center of the Cape Fear deployments and much of North Carolina. But it cannot install and service cameras here on its own say-so. North Carolina requires businesses that install and service systems covered by its alarm-systems law to be licensed — and Flock installed and serviced cameras in the state for years while disputing that the statute applied to it. A court ultimately disagreed with Flock.

The public record on that is specific:

• As of August 2026, the license the arrangement runs under is No. 367626-CSA (Class: Alarm) — issued July 23, 2024, with an August 31, 2026 expiration and a renewal pending — and it is held by an individual, Ralph Taylor, on Flock’s behalf. Taylor and Flock signed a $2,500 consent agreement for 30 months of unlicensed activity. (The state licensing record.)
• The fight started with complaints to the N.C. Alarm Systems / Private Protective Services Board in 2022 — filed, the records show, by an anonymous resident whose own HOA had installed the cameras.
• On October 30, 2023, a Wake County Superior Court judge entered a preliminary injunction barring Flock from further installing or servicing systems in North Carolina — with installations able to continue only through an appropriately licensed third party. Flock’s outside counsel in that matter was the firm Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP (Charlotte).

And here is a question the public record still has not answered. The court’s order lets installation continue only through a licensed third party. So who is it? We asked, and the identity of Flock’s licensed North Carolina installer is not something we have been able to find in the public record. The law requires a licensed installer for every pole in the public right-of-way; the public still cannot readily learn who that is. (Online claims that a national contractor performs these installs have circulated, but we have found no public record or reporting that confirms any specific installer, so we name none.)

Flock is not the only ALPR system in North Carolina, either. Our own public-records work has documented a multi-vendor landscape: Genetec AutoVu (NC State University’s parking-LPR system), Rekor (UNC Greensboro), Fusus — now owned by Axon — (Wilmington Police Department’s real-time crime center), Plate Ranger (Onslow County), and Verkada (Atlantic Beach). Cancelling one vendor’s contract does not end the surveillance; it changes the logo on the pole.

This is not a hypothetical. The Guardian reported in August 2026 that some cities dropping Flock have simply replaced it with another vendor — often Axon — leaving the underlying surveillance architecture intact. It is playing out in our own state: as we have documented on the statewide tracker, Asheville moved to cancel its Flock contract while its police department planned to switch to Axon plate readers — a vendor swap, not an end to the surveillance. Which is the whole point: this is a story about the machine, not one company. Remove Flock without changing the policy, and another company slides into its place.

National: the poles, the certification, and the cloud

Two national links close the chain, and both are documented.

The poles. Flock’s roadside cameras in North Carolina stand on MASH-tested “breakaway” poles — engineered so a car that hits one shears it off cleanly. Those structural designs were sealed by a licensed North Carolina Professional Engineer, Michael B. Leeper, P.E. (license #47119), and marked “Reviewed” by NCDOT’s Transportation Mobility & Safety Division. The breakaway coupler hardware itself (Style 7 / Model S300R) is made by Proveli / Designovations. A camera cannot go in a state right-of-way until an engineer certifies the pole — which means an engineer’s seal is part of what puts each one there.

The cloud. Every plate this network reads has to live somewhere, and — by Flock’s own account — it lives on Amazon Web Services. Flock’s published materials state that all captured data is stored in AWS (AES-256 encryption), that law-enforcement/CJIS data sits in AWS GovCloud, and that Flock’s platform is sold through the AWS Marketplace. The searchable, nationwide record of where your car has been does not sit in a police evidence room. It sits on Amazon’s servers. (Source: Flock Safety’s own privacy statements; AWS Marketplace.)

Where the record runs out — and what we won’t claim

We could have made this list longer by guessing. We didn’t. There is a whole tier of companies an ALPR camera plausibly touches — cellular carriers that could carry the data, utilities that could host poles, chipmakers whose sensors could be inside the housing, index funds that hold the vendors’ stock. We found no North Carolina record tying any specific one of them to these cameras, so we do not name them. An accountability list is only worth anything if every name on it can be pointed to a receipt. Every name above can.

If you can produce a document that adds a link — a city agenda, a permit, a contract, an installer’s authorization — send it to us and we will follow it.

One person can matter — the receipts

We don’t have to tell you that individual choices add up. We can show you.

• North Carolina. The state’s entire Flock licensing fight began with one anonymous resident who noticed their HOA had put up cameras and asked the Alarm Board a simple question: is this company even licensed? That one question triggered a state investigation, a court order, and ultimately a licensing requirement. One person → a statewide legal reckoning.
• Macon County, NC. Commissioners voted 5–0 to defund the program and physically remove the cameras. Hillsborough, Pittsboro, and Chatham County did the same by public vote — Hillsborough after officials grew concerned about the contract’s data-disclosure terms. (Statewide tracker.)
• Michigan. A college student who wanted to know where the cameras were and whether his own car had been scanned sued his county for the records, backed by the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation — proof this crosses the political spectrum.
• A national wave. Reporting this year documents communities reversing course after audits and public pressure: Mountain View, CA shut off its cameras and terminated a 30-camera contract after finding outside-agency access inconsistent with its own policy; Evanston, IL deactivated all 19 after a state audit; Harrisonburg, VA voted 4–0 to end its 31-camera system over privacy, data-security, and public-trust concerns. (We track these on the news page.)

Every one of those started the same way ours can: somebody asked a question, or cast a vote, that the machine was counting on no one asking.

We built it. We can unbuild it.

The camera on the pole is the storefront. Behind it is a private machine: a landowner’s parcel, a vendor’s license, an engineer’s seal, and a trillion-dollar cloud — all of it turning your ordinary drive into a searchable record of where your vehicle has been.

But trace the money back to its source and it ends in the same place every time: us. The county contract is our tax dollars. The shopping center that hosts a camera is banking on our business. The data itself sits on Amazon’s servers — a company whose products already fill our homes. The vendors’ stock sits in our index funds and pension plans. We help finance the surveillance that watches us — a dollar at a time, without ever deciding to.

That is the bad news and the good news in one sentence. A system built with our dollars and our votes can be taken apart with our dollars and our votes. It is not inevitable. It is a series of choices — who we elect, what we tell them, where we spend, and whether we show up — and every one of those choices is still ours to make.

So make them. Ask the commissioners who signed the contract to cancel it. Ask the landowner who hosts a camera why. Ask the candidate who won’t take a position to take one. And put your name on the record with the neighbors who have already decided they will not pay, quietly, to be watched.

Want to contact the companies’ government partners — the officials who signed and funded this? Find yours in our contact directory.

Sign the petition Show up September 21 →

General information for public discussion, not legal advice. Company roles are drawn from public records, court filings, Flock Safety’s own published materials, and the crowdsourced DeFlock map, each described above. Property-ownership entries reflect public property records tied to camera locations reported on the crowdsourced map; we have not independently verified each camera’s exact position or any hosting agreement, and identify no individual private homeowners. Corrections: info@DeFlockILM.org. Last updated August 22, 2026.