Axon Is Now Licensed in North Carolina — After Our Complaint. We Filed to Learn How

Seventeen North Carolina communities have already said no to Flock. Add your name ›  ·  The Cape Fear is under warrantless AI surveillance — it’s time to act.
← All updates

Axon Got Its North Carolina License. We Filed to Find Out How, and When.

In August, the state’s licensing board confirmed Axon Enterprise held no North Carolina license. We filed a complaint. On October 28, the board withdrew it — because Axon is now licensed. Now we want the records behind that.

On August 28, 2026, the director of the North Carolina Security Systems Licensing Board confirmed in writing that Axon Enterprise, Inc. held no North Carolina license — “not licensed, no records on file” — even as the company installed and serviced camera and license-plate systems for agencies across the state. Under Chapter 74D, that work requires a license, and North Carolina law treats the unlicensed sale, installation, or service of a security system as an unfair and deceptive trade practice in its own right. So we filed a formal complaint (Reference No. DICQD2IFI).

On October 28, 2026, the board notified us that it had withdrawn the complaint — “The company is now licensed with the Security Systems Licensing Board.”

Who now holds the license

According to the board’s records, Axon now holds:

  • License: Alarm License No. 416182-CSA, expiring October 31, 2028.
  • Licensee: Axon Enterprise, Inc., 17800 N. 85th St., Scottsdale, Arizona 85255.
  • Qualifying agent: Ryan Christopher Smith — the individual who holds the qualifying license on the company’s behalf.

We credit the result. The purpose of a Chapter 74D complaint is to bring an unlicensed operator into compliance, and Axon is now licensed — following the same path Flock took after the state’s 2022–2023 enforcement action. That is a win for the rule we have been pressing all along: the companies building North Carolina’s surveillance grid have to follow North Carolina’s licensing law like anyone else.

What we still want to know

Compliance now does not answer what happened before. Axon operated in this state while unlicensed through the period our complaint documented, and the obvious question is one the public record should settle: did Axon apply for its license before our complaint, or after? On October 29, 2026, we sent the board a public-records request (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1 et seq.) for the documents that would show it —

  • Axon’s complete license application, and the qualifying-agent application of Ryan Christopher Smith, with attachments;
  • the issuance records for Alarm No. 416182-CSA — when the application was received, when the license issued, and the staff review file;
  • all correspondence between the board and Axon (or its agents and counsel) about both the licensure and our complaint;
  • the board’s internal complaint and withdrawal file;
  • the chronology — the dates Axon applied, our complaint was received, and the license issued; and
  • any statement by Axon addressing its prior unlicensed operation in North Carolina.

The request is preserved, with the board’s prior confirmation and the Flock license records, at the Internet Archive.

Two vendors to go

Axon is one of three license-plate-reader vendors we filed Chapter 74D complaints against in August, after the board confirmed none held a North Carolina license. Our complaints against Rekor and SoundThinking (PlateRanger) stand on that confirmation, and we are re-checking their current status. The full filings, exhibits, and the board’s correspondence are posted for review.

This post reports on complaints and records requests DeFlockILM has filed with a North Carolina licensing board. It is general information, not legal advice, and creates no attorney-client relationship. Becoming licensed is compliance with state law; nothing here suggests otherwise.

Your move

You’re not a suspect. So stop being tracked like one.

It takes one minute. Add your name — then tell the officials who represent you to take the cameras down.